According to the American psychologist Howard Gardner, human
intelligence can be divided into seven categories: visual-spatial,
bodily kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, linguistic,
and logical-mathematical. This implies our intelligence strengths can be
different in each (so-called) intelligence profile and that everybody
can be intelligent in many different ways.
Gardner says these differences “challenge an educational system that
assumes that everyone can learn the same materials in the same way and
that a uniform, universal measure suffices to test student learning.”
The truth is that we learn and understand things differently, and these
differences affect the manner we read academic papers. A research paper
is usually a combination of written and visual information. We can
assume that those who have a predominant linguistic intelligence would
focus on written information, whereas those with a visual-spatial
intelligence would feel more comfortable focusing on graphs, diagrams,
or images. How to combine both to achieve a paper that
engages readers with different intelligence profiles at par?
The perfect combination
The first thing we must understand is that, no matter how much visual
support they have, papers are written works. Filling pages with
unnecessary images, graphs, diagrams or any other kind of visual
material is never a good idea. Remember that you are writing a
professional academic paper and, therefore, your capacity to discern
which material is important. Once this is clear, it is time to discern
which information is likely to be visually demonstrated.
Some main ideas would help you to decide when to use graphs. Choose
only information that can be clearer if explained visually, and only if
it is so important that you desire the reader to keep focus on it more
than in other parts. Besides, this piece of information must be
qualitatively or quantitatively measurable.
Images can also be used to summarize; plenty of information can be
perfectly summed up in a single graph. Lastly, another reason to use
images is comparison. Graphs and diagrams are great tools to indicate
the differences between two agents.
Do not fill up your images with too much information because it would complicate the readers’ understanding.
Images combine or support
the written words, but should not be used to replace them. A good
combination of words and images can ease the paper’s general
understanding.
Thinking visually: how to choose?
It is important to know the possibilities each tool offers. Graphs, for
example, are good to express the mathematical relationship or
statistical correlation between data. Line graphs are useful to present
an evolution, circulant graphs are better to indicate proportional parts
and column graphs are commonly used to compare different elements.
Researchers and academics are supposed to have a good command of
graphs usage. However, the capacity of selecting which data is most
likely to be shown this way makes the difference. Indeed, achieving a
good command of these tools is quite difficult, but is possible with
experience.
Last but not least, it is always helpful to consider the final goal
of an academic paper: communication. Thus, if the graph clearly points
to one of the research’s main statements, do not doubt in using it.
This post was written by Tania Alonso, a Content Writer with Enago.
Source: enago.blog.com
